Minneapolis Health Care Workers Are Organizing to Defend Their Patients From ICE | Truthout
In January 2026, Minneapolis became the center of national controversy after a series of federal immigration enforcement actions led to the deaths of U.S. citizens, the detention of young children, and widespread protests across the United States. These events have sparked intense public debate about civil liberties, federal law enforcement authority, immigration policy, and political rhetoric from national leaders.
Minneapolis Shootings: Who Were the Victims?
Flowers are left at a makeshift memorial Sunday in the area of Minneapolis where federal immigration agents shot and killed Alex Pretti. Octavio Jones / AFP via Getty Images
Alex Pretti — ICU Nurse and Bystander
Alex Pretti was an ICU nurse dedicated to helping others, friends and family said | CNN
On January 24, 2026, 37-year-old Alex Jeffrey Pretti —a U.S. citizen and intensive-care nurse at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs hospital —was killed during a federal immigration enforcement operation in downtown Minneapolis.
According to eyewitnesses and nonprofit rights observers, Pretti was filming the enforcement action and moved to assist a woman he believed was being treated roughly by agents when federal officers opened fire. Video reviewed by independent organizations shows agents engaging Pretti quickly after he stepped forward, and multiple shots were fired after he was on the ground. These details have raised questions about the accuracy of initial federal accounts.
Family members described Pretti as a compassionate caregiver who often helped others, and they criticized early official statements as exaggerated or misleading.
Renée Nicole Good —Earlier January Shooting
Boston area protests erupt after Minneapolis woman Renee Good is killed by ICE agent | GBH
Earlier in January, on January 7, 2026, 37-year-old Renée Nicole Good, also a U.S. citizen, was fatally shot by a federal agent during another immigration enforcement action in Minneapolis. Initial official reports characterized the incident as a defensive use of force. However, later reporting by independent journalists showed that Good was not actively threatening officers when she was shot, leading to further public concern about use of force protocols.
A publicly reported video clip released by news organizations includes an exchange between Renee Good and federal agents moments before the shooting.
According to PBS NewsHour’s coverage of newly released video, Good’s partner said that before she was killed, she had told an ICE agent:
“I’m not mad at you.”
—Statement reported from the video taken before the shooting
Renee Good Dropped 6-Year-Old Off at School Before Encountering ICE with Partner | People
This quote comes from video captured on scene that was shared with news outlets. That video also included Good’s partner saying they had stopped to support neighbors while agents had weapons.
What the video shows is a moment of interaction between Good and agents just before the fatal encounter, not a description of violence itself —and this quote humanizes her response instead of sensationalizing it.
These two deaths occurred amid a larger deployment of ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents under “Operation Metro Surge,” a federal initiative intended to expand interior immigration enforcement in Minneapolis.
Friends and family described Renée Nicole Good as deeply rooted in her Minneapolis community. She was known for showing up for people —whether that meant checking in on neighbors, helping friends navigate tough moments, or simply being present.
After her death, loved ones emphasized that she was more than a statistic or a name in a press release. “She mattered,” one family friend told reporters, pushing back against early official narratives that focused solely on enforcement justifications rather than her humanity.
Community members held vigils in her memory, sharing stories of her warmth and her role in their lives —details absent from initial federal statements.
Child Detentions: The Case of a Five-Year-Old Boy
5-Year-Old Used As ‘Bait’ During ICE Operation In Minnesota | US News
On January 20, 2026, federal agents detained 5-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos and his father near their home in Columbia Heights, a Minneapolis suburb. The boy had just returned from school when agents approached the family.
School officials reported that the presence of agents near the school disrupted students and caused fear among families. Legal filings and reporting indicate that Liam and his father have an active asylum claim and valid legal entry into the United States, raising questions about how the operation was conducted and why it involved a young child.
Rep. Joaquin Castro confirms that 5-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos & his dad Adrian have safely returned5-Year-Old Liam Is Sick In ICE Custody In Texas, Family Says | Minneapolis, MN Patch
In a separate national news image that drew public attention, the five-year-old boy detained with his father was seen wearing a blue knitted hat with bunny ears and a school backpack — visuals that highlighted the innocence of children caught up in the enforcement action.
Additional reporting indicates that at least four students from the district, including young children and teenagers, have been detained in recent weeks as part of aggressive enforcement actions.
ICE’s Rhetoric vs. What Happens in Practice
Official Language: “Targeting Criminals”
ICE and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials have frequently defended enforcement operations with language emphasizing public safety. In a 2025 White House statement, President Trump said:
“We will not stand for the vile smears, the hateful attacks, and the vicious assaults on the courageous men and women of ICE and Border Patrol… We will protect those who protect us.”
—President Donald Trump
This language frames federal immigration agents as defenders against threats such as narcotics, terrorism, and cross-border crime.
Charged Rhetoric About Protesters
In response to nationwide demonstrations over the shootings, senior administration allies used strong descriptors. Republican officials like South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem referred to protesters as:
Kristi Noem – WGA – Western Governors’ Association
“Domestic terrorists.”
—Kristi Noem, Homeland Security Secretary
Meanwhile, Trump adviser Stephen Miller went even further on social media:
“He was an assassin who tried to murder federal agents.”
Stephen Miller | ABC News
—Stephen Miller, about Alex Pretti
President Trump himself described protestors in some contexts as “paid agitators and insurrectionists,” language that was widely shared online, though independent fact-checks noted these claims were often unverified.
Warrants, Legal Authority, and Civil Rights
Federal immigration operations may use administrative warrants signed by ICE officers, which are different from judicial warrants signed by a judge. Judicial warrants require an independent determination of probable cause; administrative warrants do not carry the same constitutional protections when entering homes or private spaces. This has led to legal debate about whether enforcement actions have respected due process and constitutional rights.
A Judicial Warrant must be signed by a Judge and say U.S. District Court or State Court at the top. It is not uncommon for Immigration Authorities to use an Administrative Warrants (Forms I-200 or I-205) from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – Administrative Warrants are NOT Judicial Warrants are NOT sufficient to enter a private space on an employer’s premises. | Kolko & Casey. Immigration Attorneys & Counselors at Law
Critics argue that enforcement far from border areas —including near schools or in residential neighborhoods —violates community trust and raises civil liberties concerns, especially when families and young people are affected.
Protests and Public Reaction
The incidents in Minneapolis sparked anti-ICE protests nationwide in cities including New York, Los Angeles, Boston, and San Francisco. Demonstrators carried signs, marched in large groups, and called for accountability, policy reform, and withdrawal of federal agents from local communities.
Community members held vigils for Alex Pretti and Renée Good, and family members publicly shared memories of their loved ones to illustrate their human stories beyond headlines.
Federal and Legislative Responses
The Trump administration broadly defended the missions of ICE and CBP, emphasizing the importance of immigration enforcement to national security. At the same time, bipartisan groups of legislators called for transparency and independent investigations into the shootings, demanding access to Department of Justice records on both cases.
Legal experts and civil liberties organizations stressed the need for oversight when federal agents operate domestically with lethal force, especially against U.S. citizens.
Know Your Rights
It is important for all residents to understand fundamental legal protections:
Right to remain silent: You don’t have to answer questions about your immigration status.
Ask for a warrant: If agents claim authority to enter your home, request to see a judicial warrant signed by a judge.
Don’t sign anything without a lawyer: Always seek legal advice before agreeing to anything during interactions with law enforcement.
For detailed guidance, organizations such as the ACLU and local legal aid groups offer “Know Your Rights” materials based on current law.
Civic Engagement Matters
Immigration enforcement policy, funding for agencies like ICE, and rules about use of force are shaped by elected officials. Voting in primaries and midterm elections influences who makes these decisions —from congressional representatives to state leaders.
When students and community members participate in elections, they help shape the policies that affect families, civil rights, and public safety.
Why Primaries and Midterms Matter
Immigration policy, funding for enforcement agencies, and oversight mechanisms are shaped by elected officials in:
Congress (House and Senate)
State leadership
Local representatives
Voting in primaries and midterm elections influences who holds these offices and how immigration enforcement is prioritized. Civic participation helps hold leaders accountable and shape future policy.
Conclusion
The Minneapolis incidents in 2026 have ignited nationwide debate about immigration enforcement, civil liberties, and government accountability. By examining the facts, understanding different perspectives, and engaging thoughtfully in civic life, communities can work toward reforms that respect human dignity and democratic principles.
Your donation will support the student journalists of Judge Barefoot Sanders Law Magnet. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.
